This is the second time I have evaluated myself from a teaching perspective using the self reflection tool. In week 1 I asserted that this is something that is difficult for me. Additionally, since I am not currently teaching, nor have I taught in brick and mortar since . In week 1, I committed to working on: 1: Views practice within the broader sociological, cultural, historical, and political contexts; 2: Observes self in the process of thinking; and, 3: Suspends judgments to consider all options. These were gleaned from the self reflection survey. I derived these as a means of improving my introspection and self improvement concepts, arguably two things I do not do well with. The first one I felt I improved on largely as a result of the video, The School That Turned Chinese. I found this video fascinating and felt that the concept of culture is the major dividing factor in the video. I made me think more about how to incorporate culture and perspective into teaching methods. The second, introspection, is not as improved upon, largely because I do not do well at this and I am not currently teaching. I have tried to apply this to my current work as an air traffic controller, but the introspection involved in my job is more about means of conducting the job differently in explicit circumstances rather than a holistic but general attitude about change. The third, suspects judgments and consider all options, is something I tend to pride myself already so I feel that while I have no made strides in this, I also have not fallen backwards. I tend to think about all options, the only real constraint being frustration at processes or personal bias in others and my own personal experience as a limiting factor.
As a result of introspection, there were more entries from the self reflection tool of the positive questions in the frequently column and less of the negative questions in the frequently column. Level 3: pedagogical reflection had the most entries in the frequently category. Level 1 was mostly in the infrequently while level 2: Surface Reflection had the most entries in the sometimes category. Most of the improvement is self perceived obviously, but largely the result of a conscious effort to strive for introspection. This is in spite of the passive manner in which the introspection was used because I am not currently teaching. Life, education, and our professional life are all about continuous improvement process. It is a concept of any organizational culture that should be emphasized, but unfortunately it is often ignored, not understood, or lacking because people do not realize it is even a concept that should exist.
Because I am not teaching, I decided to use the video The School That Turned Chinese to fulfill the passive viewing portion of the assignment and multiple intelligences. Although many of the videos in NCU library for teaching methods would suffice, many of them are also videos regarding teaching methods or tutorial type videos. Because the aforementioned video is one of teaching methods in the classroom, and because I enjoyed the video, I decided to use it for the Multiple Intelligences Theory portion of the blog. In the video, English and Chinese teachers quasi-compete in teaching methods to a small collection of students. While the Chinese teachers won the competition, the theory postulated by one of the teachers was that this was more about exposure to the material because of the longer day. The Chinese students did include the students who did better in the class through more homework, but there did not seem to be much variance in their teaching method, which was entirely lecture-centric with some supplemental explanation through the use of a whiteboard. The English teachers utilized project management type learning in a small group environment.
While never actually explicitly stated in the segments that I watched, neither set of teachers seemed to focus on multiple intelligences, more about their ability to get the material taught in the manner that was most comfortable for them. The English students expressed considerably displeasure with the Chinese teachers lecture mode of teaching, in many cases becoming so bored that they completely tuned out, even becoming almost blatantly disrespectful. Interestingly enough, some research has postulated that multiple intelligences do not account for academic performance, aside from education level (Bas, 2016). Another found that 4th grade math students who used math sheets prepared based on multiple intelligences theory based on individual intelligence field did have a positive influence on academic achievement (Inan & Erkus, 2017). The students in the Chinese portion of the class did better based on academic performance than the students taught by the traditional Bohunt faculty. The faculty members, especially the Chinese ones, suggested that this is probably because of increased exposure to the material. I previously asserted this could also be the result of the better performing students getting more practice with more difficult concepts and, therefore, practice. The Chinese faculty gave the better performing students more homework than other students, which could have skewed the average performance statistic further to the right. This does not account for multiple intelligences, unless the sheets are configured such as Inan and Erkus suggest.
Lesson Plan (taken from a class I taught several years ago)
Name: David Bricker Grade Level: Undergrad
Lesson Title: Navigational AIDS in ATC Date Taught: September 2007
Subject: Intro to ATC Length of lesson: 2 hours
Standards
Be able to describe NAVAIDs used in air traffic control
List all of the NAVAIDs used by aircraft, including VOR, TACAN, VOR/DME, VORTAC, NDB, ILS, PAR, ASR, GPS/RNAV/RNP/PBN and ADS-B
Objectives
List all the NAVAIDs above
Be able to list the NAVAIDs by aircraft type
Be able to list the NAVAIDs by type of flight and phase of flight
Be able to identify the NAVAIDs on VFR sectionals and IFR charts
Materials
VFR Sectionals
IFR Charts
PowerPoint Charts
Video showing multiple phases of flight and how procedures are flown
Comment: Uses different manners of learning. For this lesson, simple lectures are not enough as this requires some interactive graphical displays and movies to provide relevance
Divide up into groups and go over the charts together. Interpersonal intelligence (groups) and spatial intelligence)
Possible Questions
What type of NAVAIDs would be used at high altitude?
When would you want to rely on ground based NAVAIDs?
When is satellite navigation an advantage?
Which aircraft use older forms of navigation?
Comment: Not meant to be a simple Q&A. Needs to be class discussion to some extent. Let them ask each other. Challenge each other. Uses elements of interpersonal intelligence.
Beginning of the lesson
Include an explanation of ATC based on previous lessons, then describe how navigation evolved through the arrows into older ground based navigation into satellite navigation
Middle of the lesson
Have them watch the video . Describe the NAVAIDs as you go , with explanations on the PowerPoint about how they work , then pictures of several aircraft and how they navigate.
Comment on video: For those who learn more via visual means. Provides context. In this class, most learn this way and via doing. Lectures tend to not work as well with ATC students. (Some spatial intelligence. Logical-mathematical intelligence via the use of charts and NAVAIDS symbols.
Comment on second sentence: Some explanation required. Intersperses the movie with sectional interaction. Same as above.
Comment on ‘with explanations: Same with this. And here
Comment on ‘then pictures’ Some aircraft use older systems. Differentiate by civilian, airline, military, etc. Provides some additional context. Also gives them reinforcement on aircraft characteristics.Some naturalist intelligence in differentiation, but also logical-mathematical and spatial intelligence. Not coincidentally, these are the primary intelligences used in air traffic control.
Ending of the lesson
Wrap up the lesson with a brief explanation of NAVAIDs and how they fit into the overall NAS. Describe how different phases of flight work together.
References
Bas, G. (2016). The effect of multiple intelligences theory-based education on academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Sciences: Theory And Practice, 16(6), 1833-1864.
Inan, C., & Erkus, S. (2017). The effect of mathematical worksheets based on multiple intelligences theory on the academic achievement of the students in the 4th grade primary school. Universal Journal Of Educational Research, 5(8), 1372-1377.